4.7 Review

The use of some plant-derived products as effective alternatives to antibiotic growth promoters in organic poultry production: a review

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH
卷 28, 期 35, 页码 47856-47868

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s11356-021-15460-7

关键词

Poultry feeding; Antibiotic alternatives; Medical herbs; Thymus vulgaris; Cichorium intybus; Coriandrum sativum; Heracleum persicum; Curcuma longa

资金

  1. Rasht Branch, Islamic Azad University [17.16.4.18418]
  2. Russian Science Foundation [21-16-00025]
  3. Russian Science Foundation [21-16-00025] Funding Source: Russian Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In the context of banning antibiotic growth promoters and consumer preference for antibiotic-free livestock products, it is crucial to research effective growth promoter alternatives in organic poultry production. Certain spice plants have been shown to be effective choices in this regard.
Improving poultry production, increasing poultry immunity, and reducing the disease spreading can be achieved by adding various potentially valuable ingredients to the feed or drinking water of poultry flocks. Because of the emergence of antimicrobial resistance, antibiotic growth promoters (AGP) in animal nutrition were prohibited. Additionally, consumer preferences tend towards purchasing products from livestock raised without antibiotics. Therefore, there is a critical need to find effective growth promoter alternatives and treatment methods for common poultry diseases. Some spice plants play important roles in improving the taste, aroma, and color of human food and their positive effects on human and animal health. The current review aimed to provide a broader perspective on some spice crops which can be effective alternatives to antibiotics in organic poultry production. These spices were including Thymus vulgaris, Cichorium intybus, Coriandrum sativum, Aloe vera, Heracleum persicum, Curcuma longa, and Glycyrrhiza glabra.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据