4.7 Article

Role of foreign direct investment interaction to energy consumption and institutional governance in sustainable GHG emission reduction

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH
卷 28, 期 40, 页码 56808-56821

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s11356-021-14650-7

关键词

Sustainable development (SD); Environmental upgradation; Greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions; Foreign direct investment; Regulatory quality (RgQ); Asia

资金

  1. Huazhong University of Science and Technology (HUST Main Campus), Wuhan, PR China. Under the Research on the Intelligent Model of Social Governance in Cities, Key Project of National Social Science Fund [20AZD089]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study finds that per capita energy consumption in Asian economies has a negative impact on greenhouse gas emissions, while regulatory quality has a positive effect on reducing emissions. Foreign direct investment plays an integrating role in promoting clean energy use and enhancing regulatory quality in Asia for sustainable environmental development.
The theme of the environmental upgrades and Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) of the United Nations is Better Environment, Better tomorrow. This study uses regulatory quality (RgQ) and energy consumption per capita (EC) as explanatory variables and foreign direct investment (FDI) as an integrating variable with RgQ and EC and examines their impacts on greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from 2001 to 2018 in panel Asian economies. The findings indicate that EC negatively impacts GHG emissions, while RgQ positively promotes the reduction of GHG emissions in Asia. In addition, FDI has an integrating role, as sufficient FDI inflows significantly enhance clean energy use and EC efficiency. Such inflows also support and improve Asia's regulation quality by upgrading standardization investments and technology deployment to enhance institutional quality and achieve SDGs. FDI inflows have thus been vital in environment upgrading in Asia and regional sustainable environmental development.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据