4.7 Article

Gibberellic acid and urease inhibitor optimize nitrogen uptake and yield of maize at varying nitrogen levels under changing climate

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH
卷 29, 期 5, 页码 6568-6577

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s11356-021-16049-w

关键词

Gibberellic acid; Nitrogen uptake; Maize; Urea and urease inhibitor

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The use of urease inhibitor and gibberellic acid significantly increased maize yield and nitrogen uptake, with the combination of the two showing the best results.
Worldwide, nitrogen (N) deficiency is the main yield limiting factor owing to its losses via leaching and volatilization. Urease inhibitors slow down urea hydrolysis in soil by inhibiting urease enzyme activities whereas gibberellic acid is growth regulator. That is why, we evaluated the role of urease inhibitor [N-(n-butyl)thiophosphorictriamide (NBPT)] and gibberellic acid (GA(3)) in improving nitrogen uptake and yield of maize under different N levels (120 and 150 kg ha(-1)) along with control. Both N levels alone and in combination with GA(3) and NBPT significantly increased yield and yield components of maize over control. In addition, 150 kg N ha(-1) + NBPT + GA(3) produced highest biological, grain, and stover yields, 1000 grain weight, plant height, and N uptake exhibiting 33.15%, 56.46%, 27.56%, 19.56%, 23.24%, and 78% increase over 150 kg N ha(-1), respectively. The sole use of gibberellic acid or NBPT with each level of N also improved the yield and yield components of maize compared to sole N application and control. Furthermore, application of 120 kg N ha(-1) along with NBPT and GA(3) performed at par to 150 kg N ha(-1) + NBPT + GA(3) but it was superior than sole applied 150 kg N ha(-1) for all the studied traits. These results imply that application of GA(3) and/or NBPT can reduce dependence on urea and improve the yield and N uptake in maize by slowing urea hydrolysis in calcareous soils and shall be practiced.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据