4.7 Article

Maximum lake surface water temperatures changing characteristics under climate change

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH
卷 29, 期 2, 页码 2547-2554

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s11356-021-15621-8

关键词

Maximum lake surface water temperature; Threshold; Ice-free lakes; Climate warming

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41761084]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

LSWT is crucial for the metabolism of aquatic organisms and lake ecosystems. Research on extreme changes in LSWT trends should be prioritized. This study found a continuous increase in MLSWT in Dianchi Lake, which may have complex and long-term impacts on cyanobacterial outbreaks, water quality, lake ecosystems, and aquatic organism growth.
Lake surface water temperature (LSWT) plays an important role in the metabolism of aquatic organisms, and is also an important indicator in lake ecosystems which affects the ecology and biogeochemical processes of lakes. The current research mainly focuses on the long-term trends of LSWT and the impact of climate warming on LSWT. Researchers have not paid enough attention to the study of extreme changes in trend of LSWT. An ice-free lake in China called Dianchi Lake was selected as our research area. We carried out a quantitative analysis of and provided a discussion on the changes in the maximum lake surface water temperature (MLSWT) from 2001 to 2018 at two timescales (month and year) based on MODIS 11A2 composite product data and water temperature environment of cyanobacteria outbreaks. The results showed that the MLSWT of Dianchi Lake increased between 2001 and 2018 and continued to exceed the temperature threshold (17.6 degrees C) for cyanobacterial outbreaks during some timeframes and that the duration of high temperatures also increased. This phenomenon will extend the suitable growth period of cyanobacteria and will have a complex and long-term impact on water quality, the lake ecological environment, and the growth of aquatic organisms.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据