4.7 Article

The influence of stock market and financial institution development on carbon emissions with the importance of renewable energy consumption and foreign direct investment in G20 countries

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH
卷 28, 期 47, 页码 67677-67688

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s11356-021-15321-3

关键词

Stock market; Financial institution; Carbon emissions; Renewable energy; FDI inflows

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study finds that stock market development reduces carbon emissions, but increases carbon emissions in developing countries; the impact of financial institution development on carbon emissions is relatively weak in developing countries; renewable energy consumption helps to reduce environmental degradation, while foreign direct investment has a negative impact on environmental quality in developed countries.
The present study aims to analyze the influence of stock market and financial institution development on carbon emissions by incorporating the role of renewable energy consumption and foreign direct investment in the function of carbon emissions on G20 member countries from 1981-217. Further, the empirical analysis is carried out on the full sample and sub-samples of developed and developing economies by employing panel econometric techniques. The findings confirm that the stock market development index reduces carbon emissions in the full sample and developed countries while increases carbon emissions in developing countries. However, the index of financial institution development increases carbon emissions in the full sample and developed countries but effect is found insignificant in the case of developing economies. The renewable energy consumption reduces the level of environmental degradation across the panels. Similarly, foreign direct investment increases environmental quality in the full sample and emerging economies while impede environmental quality in the developed economies. On the basis of empirical results, this study recommends policy implications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据