4.7 Article

Establishing a corporate social responsibility implementation model for promoting sustainability in the food sector: a hybrid approach of expert mining and ISM-MICMAC

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH
卷 29, 期 6, 页码 8851-8872

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s11356-021-16111-7

关键词

Corporate social responsibility; Initiatives; Food sector; Triple bottom line; Prioritizing; ISM-MICMAC; Developing countries; Pakistan

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Corporate social responsibility (CSR) is significantly related to food companies, with a focus on employee training and empowerment. The study recommends that food sector firms should promote employee-based strategies for CSR implementation.
Corporate social responsibility (CSR) is significantly related to food companies due to its prominent impact and greater dependency on the environment, economy, and society (triple bottom line - TBL). The CSR-related threats and opportunities' scale are shifting from single companies to networks and supply chains of the food sector. In this regard, this study empirically evaluates CSR initiatives by using Interpretive Structural Modeling (ISM) and Matrice d'Impacts Croises Multiplication Appliques a un Classement (MICMAC) methodology. So to develop an ISM-MICMAC-based framework, at first, CSR initiatives were chosen from existing literature with experts' advice. Later, MICMAC analysis results showed that employee trainings and workshops and employee welfare and empowerment are significant CSR initiatives that could help CSR's integration in the food sector of Pakistan, whereas CSR initiatives community betterment and contribution towards economic development proved least significant in the model. This study recommends that food sector firms should promote employee-based strategies in the firms. Moreover, the empirical findings of this study help to better understand CSR initiatives and their role in the implementation of CSR in the food sector of developing countries.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据