4.7 Article

Dynamic global vegetation models underestimate net CO2 flux mean and inter-annual variability in dryland ecosystems

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS
卷 16, 期 9, 页码 -

出版社

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/ac1a38

关键词

Drylands; global carbon cycle; inter-annual variability; dynamic global vegetation models

资金

  1. Macrosystems Program in the Emerging Frontiers Section of the US National Science Foundation (NSF) [1065790]
  2. French Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR) Convergence Lab Changement climatique et usage des terres (CLAND)
  3. Oak Ridge National Laboratories (ORNL)
  4. NSF
  5. USDA
  6. NOAA OAR/ARL Climate Research Program
  7. NERC Driving-C project [NE/R00062X/1]
  8. European Union [821003]
  9. National Science Foundation (NSF)
  10. National Center for Atmospheric Research - NSF [1852977]
  11. U.S. Department of Agriculture NIFA [2015-67003-23485]
  12. DOE [DE-AC05-1008 00OR22725]
  13. US Department of Energy's Office of Science

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Dryland regions, despite their sparse vegetation, have a significant impact on the global carbon cycle, with improvements needed in modeling to better represent dryland ecosystems and improve global carbon cycle projections.
Despite their sparse vegetation, dryland regions exert a huge influence over global biogeochemical cycles because they cover more than 40% of the world surface (Schimel 2010 Science 327 418-9). It is thought that drylands dominate the inter-annual variability (IAV) and long-term trend in the global carbon (C) cycle (Poulter et al 2014 Nature 509 600-3, Ahlstrom et al 2015 Science 348 895-9, Zhang et al 2018 Glob. Change Biol. 24 3954-68). Projections of the global land C sink therefore rely on accurate representation of dryland C cycle processes; however, the dynamic global vegetation models (DGVMs) used in future projections have rarely been evaluated against dryland C flux data. Here, we carried out an evaluation of 14 DGVMs (TRENDY v7) against net ecosystem exchange (NEE) data from 12 dryland flux sites in the southwestern US encompassing a range of ecosystem types (forests, shrub- and grasslands). We find that all the models underestimate both mean annual C uptake/release as well as the magnitude of NEE IAV, suggesting that improvements in representing dryland regions may improve global C cycle projections. Across all models, the sensitivity and timing of ecosystem C uptake to plant available moisture was at fault. Spring biases in gross primary production (GPP) dominate the underestimate of mean annual NEE, whereas models' lack of GPP response to water availability in both spring and summer monsoon are responsible for inability to capture NEE IAV. Errors in GPP moisture sensitivity at high elevation forested sites were more prominent during the spring, while errors at the low elevation shrub and grass-dominated sites were more important during the monsoon. We propose a range of hypotheses for why model GPP does not respond sufficiently to changing water availability that can serve as a guide for future dryland DGVM developments. Our analysis suggests that improvements in modeling C cycle processes across more than a quarter of the Earth's land surface could be achieved by addressing the moisture sensitivity of dryland C uptake.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据