4.7 Article

Estimating ecosystem maximum light use efficiency based on the water use efficiency principle

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS
卷 16, 期 10, 页码 -

出版社

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/ac263b

关键词

maximum light use efficiency; water use efficiency; carbon; water; ecosystem

资金

  1. Ministry of Science and Technology of China [2019YFC1510604]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [42041004, 42071029, 41890821]
  3. University of Technology Sydney
  4. China Scholarship Council
  5. CSIRO
  6. CAS Pioneer Talents Program

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study introduces an analytical method to estimate maximum LUE based on plant water use efficiency, which is simple and effective. The WUE-based estimates are comparable to traditional methods and can differentiate between different ecosystem types.
Light use efficiency (LUE) defines the vegetation efficiency of converting radiative energy into biochemical energy through photosynthesis. Estimating the maximum LUE (epsilon (max)) is critical yet challenging for quantifying gross primary production (GPP) using LUE-based models. This study describes an analytical method for estimating epsilon (max) based on water use efficiency (WUE) as determined by plant water use and carbon gain. Unlike other complex parameterization schemes, this WUE-based method is simple and requires four variables relatively easy to acquire. The WUE-based epsilon (max) estimates compare favorably well with values based on traditional curve fitting method and that reported in the literature, and clearly distinguished epsilon (max) between C-3 (1.48 +/- 0.33 g C MJ-1 PAR) and C-4 (2.63 +/- 0.21 g C MJ-1 PAR) dominated ecosystems. The range in epsilon (max) estimates was narrow across different years and sites within a biome. The WUE-based epsilon (max) estimate is theoretically constrained by vegetation water use and can be directly incorporated into LUE models for GPP estimation across ecosystems.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据