4.7 Article

ZIF-67-derived N-enriched porous carbon doped with Co, Fe and CoS for electrocatalytic hydrogen evolution reaction

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH
卷 200, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2021.111474

关键词

CoFeS/NC; Hydrogen evolution reaction; Active sites; Carbon matrix; Conductivity

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hybrid composites based on transition metal-doped materials show excellent performance and stability as electrocatalysts for the hydrogen evolution reaction (HER). The fabricated CoFeS/NC demonstrated outstanding HER performance and long-term stability, making it a promising material for industrial-scale H-2 production. The simple preparation method used in this study could potentially be applied to other material groups.
Hybrid composites based on transition metal-doped materials exhibit excellent performance and stability as electrocatalysts for the hydrogen evolution reaction (HER). Thus, they could easily replace HER catalysts based on noble metals. To demonstrate this, we fabricated Co, Fe, and CoS doped N-enriched porous carbon materials (CoFeS/NC) using a simple, straightforward and quick method (involving absorption, pyrolysis and sulfidation steps), which used ZIF-67 metal-organic framework (MOF) material as a precursor. The fabricated CoFeS/NC showed excellent HER performance and long-term stability: it achieved a low potential (equal to 176 mV) at 10 mA cm(-2) current density and a small Tafel slope (equal to 67.8 mV dec(-1)) in 1.0 KOH. Such outstanding HER performance was attributed to the synergistic effect of the CoFeS/NC components, including unique mesoporosity. All these properties ensured the presence of numerous active sites and high conductivity provided by the carbon matrix. The excellent CoFeS/NC electrocatalytic activity makes it a promising material for H-2 production on an industrial scale. Our work demonstrated a simple way of its preparation, which could be applied to other material groups.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据