4.7 Article

Different pyrolysis kinetics and product distribution of municipal and livestock manure sewage sludge

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION
卷 285, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2021.117197

关键词

Municipal sewage sludge; Live manure sewage Sludge; Pyrolysis; Fatty acids

资金

  1. Daegu University Research Grant

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Thermogravimetric analysis and pyrolyzer-gas chromatography/mass spectrometry were used to study the kinetic behavior and product distribution of thermal and catalytic pyrolysis of different types of sewage sludge. Municipal sewage sludge (MSS) has a lower activation energy and produces more fatty acids and cholesterol than livestock manure sewage sludge (LMSS). By using a different catalyst, the product distribution of MSS can be altered, increasing the yield of aromatic hydrocarbons.
Thermogravimetric analysis and pyrolyzer-gas chromatography/mass spectrometry measurements were taken to examine the kinetic behavior and product distribution on the thermal and catalytic pyrolysis of different types of sewage sludge. Compared to livestock manure sewage sludge (LMSS), municipal sewage sludge (MSS) had larger ash (30.3%) and lower fixed carbon (7.9%) contents. The peak intensities for the 1st decomposition region (200-380 degrees C) on the derivative thermogravimetric curve of MSS were higher than those of LMSS. In contrast, the peak height in the 2nd temperature region (>380 degrees C) of MSS was lower than that of LMSS. The activation energy for the pyrolysis of MSS (Avg. 186.5 kJ/mol) was lower than that of LMSS (Avg. 263.4 kJ/mol) over the entire conversion range. MSS produced larger amounts of fatty acids and cholesterol than LMSS. The in-situ catalytic pyrolysis of MSS over HBeta using a pyrolyzergas chromatography/mass spectrometry also produced larger amounts of aromatic hydrocarbons than LMSS, suggesting that its better feedstock properties strongly influence the final product oil quality. (C) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据