4.7 Article

Response of linden tree to nocturnal simulation of daylight conditions

期刊

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2021.104477

关键词

Tilia cordata; Gating; Heat Field Deformation method; Sap flow; Circadian rhythm; Vapour pressure deficit

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the response of sap flow in different tree organs to circadian regulation, by illuminating the crown of a linden tree with artificial daylight mimicking solar conditions. The results showed that the response of sap flow to light stimuli at night was weak and non-linear, with very low induced sap flow compared to daytime. This study demonstrated the effectiveness of internal regulation in large trees in response to external stimuli.
Although the importance of the internal clock for plant development and fitness was extensively studied in the last few decades, the majority of work was conducted in laboratory conditions using some small plants as model species. The objective of this study was to determine the response of sap flow to the circadian regulation physiological state of the entire tree. Monitoring a variety of relevant parameters and sap flow in different tree organs, we illuminated the crown of a linden tree, Tilia cordata, with artificial daylight mimicking solar conditions during three consecutive nights. The patterns of stimulated nocturnal sap flow were compared to sap flow patterns observed during daytime. The response of sap flow to light stimuli was weak compared to daytime and diminished further as night progresses. Light induced sap flow during the night was very low and the responses to changes in light intensity were highly non-linear and sluggish. While sap flow correlated directly with changes in VPD during the day, it did not respond to occasional fluctuations in VPD at night. The results convincingly demonstrated the effectiveness of the internal regulation at the level of the entire large tree through gating of external stimuli.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据