4.6 Article

Ground-State Properties and Phase Separation of Binary Mixtures in Mesoscopic Ring Lattices

期刊

ENTROPY
卷 23, 期 7, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/e23070821

关键词

boson binary mixtures; phase separation mechanism; lattice size

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, the spatial phase separation of a bosonic mixture in a four-well lattice with ring geometry was investigated using a coherent-state picture. Analytic solutions were obtained for the distribution of boson components in the ring lattice, revealing the architecture of the ground-state phase diagram. The comparison with L-well phase diagrams showed that increasing the number of wells significantly modifies the phase diagram structure and transition mechanisms.
We investigated the spatial phase separation of the two components forming a bosonic mixture distributed in a four-well lattice with a ring geometry. We studied the ground state of this system, described by means of a binary Bose-Hubbard Hamiltonian, by implementing a well-known coherent-state picture which allowed us to find the semi-classical equations determining the distribution of boson components in the ring lattice. Their fully analytic solutions, in the limit of large boson numbers, provide the boson populations at each well as a function of the interspecies interaction and of other significant model parameters, while allowing to reconstruct the non-trivial architecture of the ground-state four-well phase diagram. The comparison with the L-well (L=2,3) phase diagrams highlights how increasing the number of wells considerably modifies the phase diagram structure and the transition mechanism from the full-mixing to the full-demixing phase controlled by the interspecies interaction. Despite the fact that the phase diagrams for L=2,3,4 share various general properties, we show that, unlike attractive binary mixtures, repulsive mixtures do not feature a transition mechanism which can be extended to an arbitrary lattice of size L.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据