4.7 Article

A novel improved Harris Hawks optimization algorithm coupled with ELM for predicting permeability of tight carbonates

期刊

ENGINEERING WITH COMPUTERS
卷 38, 期 SUPPL 5, 页码 4323-4346

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00366-021-01466-9

关键词

Permeability; Machine learning; Metaheuristic optimisation; HHO; IHHO; SMA

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A novel hybrid model combining IHHO and ELM was proposed to predict the permeability of tight carbonates, achieving highly accurate predictions in the testing phase. The results of the proposed ELM-IHHO model outperformed other benchmark models in predicting the permeability of tight carbonates.
Tight carbonate reservoirs appear to be heterogeneous due to the patchy production of various digenetic properties. Consequently, the permeability calculation of tight rocks is costly, and only a finite number of core plugs in any single reservoir can be estimated. Hence, in the present study, a novel hybrid model constructed by combination of the improved version of the Harris Hawks optimisation (HHO), i.e., IHHO, and extreme learning machine (ELM) is proposed to predict the permeability of tight carbonates using limited number of input variables. The proposed IHHO employs a mutation mechanism to avoid trapping in local optima by increasing the search capabilities. Subsequently, ELM-IHHO, a novel metaheuristic ELM-based algorithm, was developed to predict the permeability of tight carbonates. Experimental results show that the proposed ELM-IHHO attained the most accurate prediction with R-2 = 0.9254 and RMSE = 0.0619 in the testing phase. The result of the proposed model is significantly better than those obtained from other ELM-based hybrid models developed with particle swarm optimisation, genetic algorithm, and slime mould algorithm. The results also illustrate that the proposed ELM-IHHO model outperforms the other benchmark model, such as back-propagation neural nets, support vector regression, random forest, and group method of data handling in predicting the permeability of tight carbonates.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据