4.7 Article

Research on freeze-thaw damage to RC column based on incompatibility deformation from pores

期刊

ENGINEERING STRUCTURES
卷 241, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.112462

关键词

Reinforced concrete column; Meso-numerical simulation; Eccentric compression; Freeze-thaw damage

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51778108]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study demonstrates that the meso-calculation method effectively reflects the frost damage of concrete. Additionally, the research shows the transition of failure modes in specimens as FTCs increase, as well as the impact of freeze-thaw cycles on the ductility of concrete.
In cold environment, the durability of reinforced concrete (RC) structure mainly depends on its frost resistance. Based on the incompatibility deformation from pores, the meso-calculation model was established for concrete under freeze-thaw cycles (FTCs). Meanwhile, the meso-numerical model of RC columns with FTCs under eccentric compression was established to verify the calculation method. Moreover, the mechanical behavior of RC columns with different FTCs was discussed by the calculation method. The results show that the frost damage of concrete can be effectively reflected by the meso-calculation method, and the calculation method was verified by comparing theoretical calculation results and test results. Moreover, the non-linear characteristics of the specimen under eccentric compression can be obtained from the calculation model. And the deterioration of concrete caused by 100 FTCs has a significant effect on the ductility of specimens. With the increase of FTCs, the failure mode of specimens under large eccentric compression transforms to the failure of specimens under small eccentric compression, which is consistent with the test results. This numerical simulation method can be used to predict the mechanical behavior of RC structures after FTCs, and the theoretical calculation results have certain safety reserves for RC structures.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据