4.5 Article

Integrated disassembly and reprocessing lot-sizing for multi-level structured products in remanufacturing systems

期刊

ENGINEERING OPTIMIZATION
卷 54, 期 9, 页码 1476-1493

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/0305215X.2021.1940990

关键词

Remanufacturing; multi-level disassembly structure; dynamic lot-sizing; heuristics

资金

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Korea government (MSIT) [2020R1F1A1049516]
  2. National Research Foundation of Korea [2020R1F1A1049516] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study addresses a dynamic lot-sizing problem for remanufacturing systems, proposes an integer programming model to minimize the total cost, and introduces two-stage heuristics to solve the problem, showing that these methods can effectively solve small-sized instances.
This study addresses a dynamic lot-sizing problem for remanufacturing systems in which end-of-use/life products are disassembled into their parts on a single disassembly workstation and then each part is reprocessed on one of the parallel reprocessing workstations. The problem, which integrates disassembly and reprocessing lot-sizing for multi-level disassembly structures, determines disassembly and reprocessing lot-sizes as well as the workstation on which each part is reprocessed, while satisfying workstation capacities and reprocessed part demands in each period of a planning horizon. An integer programming model is developed that minimizes the sum of set-up, operation and inventory costs. After the NP hardness is shown, two-stage heuristics are proposed in which an initial solution is obtained and then improved by full and partial bi-directional moves. Computational results show that the full move-based heuristic gives near-optimal solutions for small-sized instances and the partial move-based heuristic gives fast solutions with appropriate qualities.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据