4.7 Article

Experimental and numerical analysis of 3D printed suture joints under shearing load

期刊

ENGINEERING FRACTURE MECHANICS
卷 253, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2021.107912

关键词

Interface; Shear; Additive manufacturing; Printing direction; Finite element; Damage

资金

  1. NSF [CMMI-1362893, 1554468]
  2. DoD/AFOSR [FA9550-16-10011]
  3. Northeastern University
  4. Div Of Civil, Mechanical, & Manufact Inn
  5. Directorate For Engineering [1554468] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The shear resistance of bio-inspired suture joints with different waviness is explored using an integrated experimental and numerical approach. Polymeric single lap shear specimens with different waviness are designed and fabricated via multi-material additive manufacturing. Results show that the 3D printed suture joints fail under combined adhesive and cohesive failure mechanisms.
The shear resistance of bio-inspired suture joints with different waviness is explored through an integrated experimental and numerical approach. Polymeric single lap shear specimens with different waviness are designed and fabricated via multi-material additive manufacturing. Quasistatic mechanical experiments are performed to quantify the effective shear stiffness and strength of the joints. SEM images show that the 3D printed suture joints fail under combined adhesive and cohesive failure mechanisms. To evaluate the effects of printing direction on the mechanical behaviors of suture joints, both tensile and single lap shear specimens are designed and printed in two orthogonal directions: parallel to the interface (H direction) and perpendicular to the interface (V direction). An inverse method was used to obtained the effective material properties of the interfacial layer printed in both directions. Nonlinear Finite Element models with cohesive interaction and mixed mode damage initiation and evolution are developed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据