4.7 Article

Flexural performances and failure analyses of parallel bamboo strand lumber plates

期刊

ENGINEERING FRACTURE MECHANICS
卷 254, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2021.107922

关键词

Bamboo fibers; Mechanical properties; Failure; Mechanical testing

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11972184, U20A20286]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province of China [BK20201286]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This research investigated the bending behaviors and fracture mechanics of parallel bamboo strand lumber (PBSL) plates, revealing the impact of orthotropic mechanical behavior on the failure process. The study proposed an orthotropic bamboo plate theory and a composite failure theory to predict deformation, internal forces, stresses, strains, cracking load, and ultimate load of PBSL plates, making significant progress in promoting their application in structural engineering.
Bending behaviors and fracture mechanics of parallel bamboo strand lumber (PBSL) plates are seldom investigated. In this research, orthotropic PBSL plates were designed and fabricated. Flexural experiments were performed to reveal the deformation, the failure process and the load carrying ability of the PBSL plate under concentrated load. Orthotropic mechanical behavior of the PBSL greatly influences the failure process of the PBSL plate. Progressive damage characterizes the failure process. Initial matrix tensile fracture, later fibre compression fracture and final punch failure take place successively. An orthotropic bamboo plate theory was suggested to predict the deformation, the internal forces, the stresses and the strains of the PBSL plate. A composite failure theory based on matrix fracture and fiber fracture was proposed to predict the cracking load and the ultimate load of the PBSL plate. All these attempts make great progress in the research of PBSL plates and could effectively promote their application in structural engineering.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据