4.7 Article

Stress intensity factors for external corrosions and cracking of buried cast iron pipes

期刊

ENGINEERING FRACTURE MECHANICS
卷 250, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2021.107778

关键词

Cast iron pipe; Semi-elliptical external crack; Corrosion; Fracture mechanics; Shape parameter; Stress Intensity Factors (SIF)

资金

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper introduces a method for calculating the stress intensity factors (SIFs) of buried cast iron pipes with corrosion and cracks on the exterior surface. It evaluates SIFs for semi-elliptical-shaped defects with various aspect ratios and relative depths under internal pressure and vertical surface loads. The study proposes a simplified method for assessing the SIFs of buried pipes with exterior surface defects.
The municipal water distribution systems across the world include a significant amount of castiron pipes. Many of the buried cast-iron pipes are over fifty years old and require rehabilitation. Municipalities decide on a rehabilitation solution between the replacement and re-use of the existing pipes based on the remaining strengths of the pipes. Fracture mechanics has appeared as the most viable tool for remaining strength assessment of the deteriorating pipes. However, a method of assessing the stress intensity factor (SIF) is often not available to municipal engineers to apply fracture mechanics. This paper presents a method for calculating the SIFs of buried cast iron pipes subjected to corrosion and crack on the exterior surface. Different semi-ellipticalshaped defects were characterized using various aspect ratios (crack-depth to crack-length ratio) and relative depths (crack-depth to pipe thickness ratio). The SIFs were assessed for invert/crown and springline position cracks under internal pressure and vertical surface loads. A simplified method is proposed for evaluating the SIFs of buried pipes subjected to the exterior surface defects.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据