4.7 Article

Failure analysis of screw shaft in screw compressor

期刊

ENGINEERING FAILURE ANALYSIS
卷 125, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2021.105424

关键词

Screw compressor; Screw shaft; Failure analysis; Fatigue fracture

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [52001148]
  2. Key Research Project of Jiangxi Academy of Sciences [2020-YZD-18, 2020-YZD-20]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangxi Academy of Sciences [2018-YYB-12, 2018-XTPH1-12, 2019-YYB-07, 2019-XTPH1-07]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The main reason for the failure of screw compressor shaft is multisource fatigue due to lack of surface quenching, and better control of surface quenching is strongly recommended to prevent similar failures.
A commonly used device for producing compressed air in refineries is the screw compressor. This kind of compressor has been widely used in several applications, such as the electric power, chemical and energy industries, mainly due to its high efficiency and safety [1-6]. Basically, a screw compressor consists of two rotors in a common casting [7]. The rotors are typically made of carbon steel, and the compressor casting is typically made of cast iron [8]. However, it is important to note that during in-service time, the screw shaft, as a critical component of the rotor, is always subjected to high rotational velocity and aggressive environments. To date, several factors have been shown to lead to screw shaft failure. Shahrivar et al. [8] investigated the failure of screw This paper analyses the root causes of screw shaft failure in screw compressors. The failure mechanism was studied by visual inspection, macro-and microfractography, chemical characterization, and mechanical property analysis. The results reveal that the main reason for the failure was multisource fatigue due to the lack of surface quenching at the fracture position of the shaft root. To prevent similar failures, better control of surface quenching is strongly recommended.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据