4.7 Article

Industrial fault diagnosis based on active learning and semi-supervised learning using small training set

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.engappai.2021.104365

关键词

Fault diagnosis; Small training set; Active learning; Semi-supervised ensemble learning

资金

  1. Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Cyber-Physical Systems, China [2016B030301008]
  2. Key Project of Youth Fund of Guangdong University of Technology, China [17QNZD001]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study proposes a fault diagnosis method based on active and semi-supervised learning, which improves model performance by selecting uncertain unlabelled samples and using heterogeneous classifiers, suitable for fault diagnosis with a small training set.
Industrial fault diagnosis has been investigated for many years, and many approaches have been proposed to identify industrial faults. However, the size of the actual training set is usually small, which severely degrades the performance of existing fault diagnostic models. To solve this problem, a new fault diagnosis method was proposed based on active and semi-supervised learning. First, uncertain unlabelled samples were selected by estimating the first two values in the class probability distribution of the samples. They were labelled by experts to update the performance of the models learned from a small training set. Second, heterogeneous classifiers were adopted to increase the diversity of the base classifiers, and noise samples were deleted using a sample pruning operation. The weights of the base classifier were designed for ensemble learning based on the test error rates. An evaluation using the Case Western Reserve University and Intelligent Maintenance Systems data showed that the performance of the proposed method was better than those of the other methods in the experiment. The experimental results showed that this study provided a promising and useful methodology for fault diagnosis under a small training set.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据