4.7 Article

The financing efficiency of listed energy conservation and environmental protection firms: Evidence and implications for green finance in China

期刊

ENERGY POLICY
卷 153, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2021.112254

关键词

Energy conservation and environmental protection industry; Financing efficiency; Green finance

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study examines the financing efficiency of Chinese-listed ECEP firms from 2010 to 2019, finding that banks are dominant in providing credits, firms listed on the second board exhibit higher financing efficiency, and firms in central and western regions have improved financing efficiency, especially after 2016. Both country-level and firm-level factors impact financing efficiency.
With the implementation of a series of policies related to the energy conservation and environmental protection (ECEP) industry, green finance has become a crucial approach to provide credits for the ECEP industry. Using data on Chinese-listed ECEP firms from 2010 to 2019, this work quantitatively identifies the financing efficiency of these firms and its determinants. The main results show that banks are still dominant in the Chinese financial market for providing credits, and firms listed on the second board show higher financing efficiency. The financing efficiency of firms located in the central and western regions improves significantly, especially after 2016, reflecting the interaction effect of green finance policies and economic policies supporting underdeveloped regions. Both country-level factors (e.g., formal institutions and financial supervision) and firm-level factors (e.g., firm size and debt ratio) have an impact on financing efficiency. These findings have important implications for policymakers who are carefully contemplating green finance policies to support ECEP firms through an effective financial market mechanism, which eventually helps to realize the transition of the energy sector.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据