4.7 Article

Leveraging scale economies and policy incentives: Carbon capture, utilization & storage in Gulf clusters

期刊

ENERGY POLICY
卷 156, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2021.112452

关键词

Industrial emissions; Carbon capture; Climate change mitigation; Marginal abatement cost; 45Q tax incentive; Cost-effectiveness

资金

  1. Cynthia and George Mitchell Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study estimated the costs of constructing and operating new CCUS facilities on the Texas and Louisiana Gulf Coast and compared them to U.S. tax incentives. The results suggest that federal tax incentives could support significant CCUS development in the Gulf region, but there are potential policy barriers that need to be addressed.
Carbon capture, utilization and storage (CCUS) represents a set of technologies essential to meeting ambitious mid-to late-century decarbonization goals. Yet deployment of CCUS has been slow, with fewer than 20 largescale facilities operating worldwide in 2019. We estimate the total and marginal cost of constructing and operating new CCUS facilities and associated infrastructure to reduce carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from current and planned industrial facilities on the Texas and Louisiana Gulf Coast. We compare these cost estimates to scheduled CCUS tax incentives through 2026 under section 45Q of the U.S. Internal Revenue Code to quantify cost-effective emissions abatement. Our analysis measures the cost-reducing potential of economies of scale in regional CO2 pipeline networks. We also compare CCUS costs to one measure of the benefits of carbon capture, the social cost of carbon. Results suggest that U.S. federal tax incentives currently in place through 2026 could justify between 3.3 million and 77.6 million tons of annual CCUS in the Gulf region, depending on the choice of storage technology and the degree of pipeline network coordination. Finally, we highlight several potential policy barriers that may explain low adoption of CCUS in the Gulf Region and elsewhere.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据