4.7 Article

Mathematical modeling of double-stage humidification compression desalination: Series and parallel configurations

期刊

ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT
卷 239, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.enconman.2021.114210

关键词

Humidification-Compression; Mathematical Modeling; Desalination; Humidification-Dehumidification; Multi-Stage

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study evaluates a humidification-dehumidification desalination system where dehumidification is achieved through compression. Two double-stage humidification compression configurations are proposed and mathematical models are developed for all system parts to assess the impact of operating conditions. Experimental data validate the modeling results, showing higher water productivity and energy efficiency for the parallel configuration compared to the series configuration under all operating conditions.
The performance of a type of humidification-dehumidification desalination, where dehumidification is accomplished by compression is assessed. This desalination system is named humidification compression. Since the process sequence has a major effect on the system performance, in this study, two double-stage humidification compression configurations, where humidification columns operate at different pressures, are proposed and assessed. The mathematical models are developed for all parts of the system to assess the effect of operating conditions on these configurations. The modeling results are evaluated by experimental data, and the results indicate good conformity between modeling and experimental data. The pressure effect of the second humidification column, the temperature difference in the heat exchanger, and the water flow fraction to the first humidification column on the system performance are assessed. It is observed that water productivity and energy efficiency for the parallel configuration are higher than those of the series configuration under all operating conditions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据