4.7 Article

The RNA world in the 21st century-a systems approach to finding non-coding keys to clinical questions

期刊

BRIEFINGS IN BIOINFORMATICS
卷 17, 期 3, 页码 380-392

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/bib/bbv061

关键词

lncRNA; miRNA; RNA function prediction; RNA systems medicine; target prediction; ncRNA network modeling

资金

  1. German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) as part of e:Bio-SysMet [0316171]
  2. German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) as part of e:Bio-mirSys [0316175A]
  3. Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR) India [GENESIS network project] [BSC0121]
  4. Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR) India [INDEPTH network project] [BSC0111]
  5. Erlangen University Hospital [14-07-22-1-Vera-Gonzalez]
  6. German Research Foundation (DFG) [GRK-1660, SPP-1757]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

There was evidence that RNAs are a functionally rich class of molecules not only since the arrival of the next-generation sequencing technology. Non-coding RNAs (ncRNA) could be the key to accelerated diagnosis and enhanced prediction of disease and therapy outcomes as well as the design of advanced therapeutic strategies to overcome yet unsatisfactory approaches. In this review, we discuss the state of the art in RNA systems biology with focus on the application in the systems biomedicine field. We propose guidelines for analysing the role of microRNAs and long non-coding RNAs in human pathologies. We introduce RNA expression profiling and network approaches for the identification of stable and effective RNomics-based biomarkers, providing insights into the role of ncRNAs in disease regulation. Towards this, we discuss ways to model the dynamics of gene regulatory networks and signalling pathways that involve ncRNAs. We also describe data resources and computational methods for finding putative mechanisms of action of ncRNAs. Finally, we discuss avenues for the computer-aided design of novel RNA-based therapeutics.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据