4.7 Review

Oxidative Desulfurization of Liquid Fuels Using Polyoxometalate-Based Catalysts: A Review

期刊

ENERGY & FUELS
卷 35, 期 13, 页码 10347-10373

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.1c00862

关键词

-

资金

  1. Research Council of Iran University of Science and Technology (Tehran)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Currently, desulfurization of liquid fuels is inevitable due to strict regulations. Hydrodesulfurization technology is widely used, but not effective enough for removing refractory sulfur compounds. Therefore, oxidative desulfurization process has become a promising alternative with high selectivity and efficiency.
Nowadays, desulfurization of liquid fuels is inevitable because of strict environmental and industrial regulations on liquid fuels specifications. Hydrodesulfurization (HDS) technology has been used widely to produce fuels with ultralow sulfur content (S <= 10 ppm). However, this method is not effective enough for removing refractory sulfur compounds (e.g., benzothiophene, dibenzothiophene, and their derivatives). Consequently, alternative or supplementary desulfurization methods have been rapidly developed in recent years. The oxidative desulfurization (ODS) process is a promising method with high selectivity, low cost, mild reaction conditions, and high efficiency. In the past few decades, the ODS process of fuels by polyoxometalates (POMs) as catalysts have attracted considerable attention, resulting in different works have been published due to their strong acidity, fast and reversible multielectron redox properties, tunable redox properties, as well as thermal, hydrolytic, and oxidative stability. In this review, the removal of S-compounds from fuel oils is investigated via the ODS process using homogeneous and heterogeneous polyoxometalate catalysts. Moreover, the advantages and problems of each system are discussed. Various techniques for reducing their noticeable drawbacks are also presented. Finally, the regeneration of POM catalysts, as an important step in industrial applications, is examined.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据