4.7 Article

Selective Hydrogenation of CO2 to Hydrocarbons: Effects of Fe3O4 Particle Size on Reduction, Carburization, and Catalytic Performance

期刊

ENERGY & FUELS
卷 35, 期 13, 页码 10703-10709

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.1c01265

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2016YFB0600902-4]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21908043]
  3. Key Project of Henan Province [192102310209]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Conversion of CO2 via hydrogenation to chemicals and fuels using iron-based catalysts is a promising route, but different particle sizes of Fe3O4 nanoparticles have varying effects on catalytic performance, with larger particles being more difficult to reduce and carburize. Various iron species formed during the reaction result in different catalytic performances, with the catalyst having an appropriate proportion of Fe3O4 and Fe5C2 phases achieving the highest CO2 conversion and olefins-to-paraffins ratio.
Conversion of CO2 via hydrogenation to chemicals and fuels is deemed to be a promising route to utilize carbon sources. Iron-based catalysts are widely used in CO2 hydrogenation to produce value-added hydrocarbons. The prereduction and reaction conditions usually cause complicated evolution of iron phases. In this work, Fe3O4 nanoparticles with different particle sizes were synthesized to investigate the effects of the reduction and carburization behavior on the catalytic performance of iron-based catalysts during CO2 hydrogenation. It was demonstrated that larger Fe3O4 nanoparticles are more difficult to be reduced and carburized. Various iron species were formed in catalysts during the reaction, resulting in different catalytic performances. The high content of inactive alpha-Fe caused lower CO2 conversion and olefins-to-paraffins ratio (O/P) over larger Fe3O4 nanoparticles. The highest CO2 conversion (41.7%) and O/P (1.71) were obtained over the catalyst with the appropriate proportion of Fe3O4 and Fe5C2 phases.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据