Techno-economic and life cycle greenhouse gas emissions assessment of liquefied natural gas supply chain in China

This study assessed the techno-economic performance and life cycle greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions for various liquefied natural gas (LNG) supply chains in China in order to find the most efficient way to supply and use LNG. This study improves current literature by adding supply chain optimization options (cold energy recovery and hydrogen production) and by analyzing the entire supply chain of four different LNG end-users (power generation, industrial heating, residential heating, and truck usage). This resulted in 33 LNG pathways for which the energy efficiency, life cycle GHG emissions, and life cycle costs were determined by process-based material and energy flow analysis, life cycle assessment, and production cost calculation, respectively. The LNG and hydrogen supply chains were compared with a reference chain (coal or diesel) to determine avoided GHG emissions and GHG avoidance costs. Results show that NG with full cryogenic carbon dioxide capture (FCCC) is most beneficial pathway for both avoided GHG emissions and GHG avoidance costs (70.5-112.4 g CO2-e/MJLNG and 66.0-95.9 $/t CO2-e). The best case was obtained when NG with FCCC replaces coal-fired power plants. Results also indicate that hydrogen pathways requires maturation of new technology options and significant capital cost reductions to become attractive. (C) 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Automated summary

This study evaluated the techno-economic performance and life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of various liquefied natural gas (LNG) supply chains in China, finding that natural gas with full cryogenic carbon dioxide capture is the most beneficial pathway for avoiding GHG emissions and costs. Hydrogen pathways require technology maturity and cost reductions to become attractive.