4.7 Article

Parameters identification of photovoltaic models by using an enhanced adaptive butterfly optimization algorithm

期刊

ENERGY
卷 229, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2021.120750

关键词

Butterfly optimization algorithm; Photovoltaic models; Parameter identification; Global optimization

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61463009]
  2. Science and Technology Foundation of Guizhou Province, China [[2020] 1Y012]
  3. Innovation Group Project of Education Department of Guizhou Province, China [KY [2021] 015]
  4. Guizhou Key Laboratory of Big Data Statistics Analysis [BDSA20200101]
  5. Joint Foundation of Guizhou University of Finance & Economics and Ministry of Commerce, China [2016SWBZD13]
  6. Natural Science Foundation in the Hunan Province of China [2020JJ4382]
  7. Key Projects of Education Department of Hunan Province, China [19A254]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The paper proposes a variant of butterfly optimization algorithm (EABOA) to identify unknown parameters of PV models, which shows better performance than other selected algorithms in terms of accuracy and reliability.
Establishing accurate and reliable models based on the measured data for photo-voltaic (PV) modules are significant to design, control and evaluate the PV systems. Although many meta-heuristic algorithms have been proposed in the literature, achieving reliable, accurate and quick parameters identification for PV models is still a challenge. This paper develops a variant of butterfly optimization algorithm (called EABOA) to identify the unknown parameters of PV models. In EABOA, a new position search equation and good-point set are proposed to balance between exploration and exploitation. 12 classical benchmark test problems are firstly selected for verifying the effectiveness of EABOA, and the results indicate that EABOA provides better performance than other selected algorithms. Then, EABOA is applied to identify the unknown parameters of three benchmark test PV models, i.e., single diode (SD), double diode (DD) and PV module models. The comparison results with some other reported parameter identification methods from literature suggest that the proposed EABOA outperforms most approaches in terms of accuracy and reliability. The least SIAE value of EABOA is smaller than other compared algorithms about 56.6%, 5.84%, and 10.2% for SD, DD, and PV module models, respectively. Finally, EABOA is applied to solve parameter identification problem of practical module and obtains the satisfactory results. (c) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据