4.5 Article

Decomposition of Industrial Electricity Efficiency and Electricity-Saving Potential of Special Economic Zones in China Considering the Heterogeneity of Administrative Hierarchy and Regional Location

期刊

ENERGIES
卷 14, 期 17, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/en14175468

关键词

meta-frontier DEA; special economic zone; industrial electricity efficiency; electricity-saving potential

资金

  1. Post-funded Project of Innovation Program of Guizhou Academy of Social Science [CXHQ 2104]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study proposed an improved analytical model to analyze the industrial electricity efficiency and electricity-saving potential of SEZs in Guizhou Province, China, based on 4-year survey data. Results showed that the energy efficiency of SEZs is related to the richness of energy resources and ecological environment in the region.
Special Economic Zones (SEZs), an important engine of industrial economic development in China, consume large amounts of energy resources and emit considerable CO2. However, existing research pays little attention to industrial energy usage in SEZs and ignores the heterogeneity of administrative hierarchy and regional location. Considering the dual heterogeneity, this study proposes an improved two-dimension and two-level meta-frontier data envelopment analytical model to decompose the industrial electricity efficiency (IEE) and electricity-saving potential of SEZs in Guizhou Province, China, based on 4-year field survey data (2016-2019). Results show that the IEE rankings of three administrative hierarchies within SEZs are provincial administration SEZs, county administration SEZs, and municipality administration SEZs. The SEZs located in energy resource-rich areas and better ecological environmental areas have higher IEE than those in resource-poor areas and ecology fragile areas, respectively. This study can provide reference for policymakers to formulate effective policies for improving the electricity use efficiency of SEZs in China.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据