4.5 Article

Adaptive Mode Selection Strategy for Series-Parallel Hybrid Electric Vehicles Based on Variable Power Reserve

期刊

ENERGIES
卷 14, 期 11, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/en14113171

关键词

hybrid electric vehicle; adaptive mode selection; drivability; variable power reserve; mode switching

资金

  1. National Key R&D Program, China [2016YFB0101402]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An adaptive mode selection strategy based on variable power reserve is proposed in this paper to allow the vehicle to switch modes effectively considering the battery power limitation. The strategy proves to be effective in simulation, reducing total driving power drop by 74.2% under high-speed US06 cycle and 65% under city FTP cycle while maintaining stable fuel consumption and battery utilization rate.
When the series-parallel hybrid electric vehicle exits the pure electric mode, the battery provides power for the drive motor and integrated starter generator (ISG) to drive the vehicle and start the engine. If the battery discharge power is insufficient, the driving power will drop, which will inhibit the vehicle from accelerating and impair drivability. Considering that the mode selection strategy determines the timing of mode switching, this paper proposes an adaptive mode selection strategy based on variable power reserve to allow the vehicle to switch mode considering the battery power limitation. The effectiveness of this strategy is verified by simulation, and its influence on fuel consumption and battery utilization is analyzed. Compared with the mode selection strategy based on logic thresholds at the same initial battery state of charge (SOC), under the high-speed and aggressive US06 cycle, the total driving power drop is reduced by 74.2%, and the over-discharge power of the battery is fully restrained while keep almost the same fuel consumption; under the city FTP cycle, the total driving power drop is reduced 65%, and fuel consumption is reduced while maintaining SOC at a reasonable level.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据