4.5 Article

Effect of CO2 Flooding on the Wettability Evolution of Sand-Stone

期刊

ENERGIES
卷 14, 期 17, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/en14175542

关键词

CO2 injectivity; wettability; contact angle; sandstone; CO2 sequestration

资金

  1. LPDP-Indonesia endowment fund for education, Ministry of Finance of the Republic of Indonesia

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study aims to evaluate the wettability of sandstone samples at different pressures and temperatures, before and after CO2 injection. The results show that the contact angles of the sandstone samples increase with pressure, indicating that the sandstones become more CO2-wet after CO2 injection.
Wettability is one of the main parameters controlling CO2 injectivity and the movement of CO2 plume during geological CO2 sequestration. Despite significant research efforts, there is still a high uncertainty associated with the wettability of CO2/brine/rock systems and how they evolve with CO2 exposure. This study, therefore, aims to measure the contact angle of sandstone samples with varying clay content before and after laboratory core flooding at different reservoir pressures, of 10 MPa and 15 MPa, and a temperature of 323 K. The samples' microstructural changes are also assessed to investigate any potential alteration in the samples' structure due to carbonated water exposure. The results show that the advancing and receding contact angles increased with the increasing pressure for both the Berea and Bandera Gray samples. Moreover, the results indicate that Bandera Gray sandstone has a higher contact angle. The sandstones also turn slightly more hydrophobic after core flooding, indicating that the sandstones become more CO2-wet after CO2 injection. These results suggest that CO2 flooding leads to an increase in the CO2-wettability of sandstone, and thus an increase in vertical CO2 plume migration and solubility trapping, and a reduction in the residual trapping capacity, especially when extrapolated to more prolonged field-scale injection and exposure times.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据