4.5 Article

Comparative TCO Analysis of Battery Electric and Hydrogen Fuel Cell Buses for Public Transport System in Small to Midsize Cities

期刊

ENERGIES
卷 14, 期 14, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/en14144384

关键词

electric bus; hydrogen bus; zero-emission buses (ZEB); city bus; public transport; total cost of ownership (TCO)

资金

  1. Ministry of the Environment, Climate and Energy Economics in the State of Baden-Wurttemberg [BWOPN 18006]
  2. Baden-Wurttemberg Ministry of Science, Research and Culture
  3. Offenburg University of Applied Sciences

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper presents an in-depth techno-economic analysis of the public transport sector in a small to midsize city and its surrounding area, comparing the total cost of ownership (TCO) of electric and hydrogen fuel cell buses. The TCO results for electric buses show a significant cost decrease by 23.5% until 2030 compared to conventional diesel buses. The optimal electric bus charging system would be opportunity (pantograph) charging infrastructure.
This paper shows the results of an in-depth techno-economic analysis of the public transport sector in a small to midsize city and its surrounding area. Public battery-electric and hydrogen fuel cell buses are comparatively evaluated by means of a total cost of ownership (TCO) model building on historical data and a projection of market prices. Additionally, a structural analysis of the public transport system of a specific city is performed, assessing best fitting bus lines for the use of electric or hydrogen busses, which is supported by a brief acceptance evaluation of the local citizens. The TCO results for electric buses show a strong cost decrease until the year 2030, reaching 23.5% lower TCOs compared to the conventional diesel bus. The optimal electric bus charging system will be the opportunity (pantograph) charging infrastructure. However, the opportunity charging method is applicable under the assumption that several buses share the same station and there is a hotspot where as many as possible bus lines converge. In the case of electric buses for the year 2020, the parameter which influenced the most on the TCO was the battery cost, opposite to the year 2030 in where the bus body cost and fuel cost parameters are the ones that dominate the TCO, due to the learning rate of the batteries. For H-2 buses, finding a hotspot is not crucial because they have a similar range to the diesel ones as well as a similar refueling time. H-2 buses until 2030 still have 15.4% higher TCO than the diesel bus system. Considering the benefits of a hypothetical scaling-up effect of hydrogen infrastructures in the region, the hydrogen cost could drop to 5 euro/kg. In this case, the overall TCO of the hydrogen solution would drop to a slightly lower TCO than the diesel solution in 2030. Therefore, hydrogen buses can be competitive in small to midsize cities, even with limited routes. For hydrogen buses, the bus body and fuel cost make up a large part of the TCO. Reducing the fuel cost will be an important aspect to reduce the total TCO of the hydrogen bus.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据