4.5 Article

Evaluation of Street Lighting Efficiency Using a Mobile Measurement System

期刊

ENERGIES
卷 14, 期 13, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/en14133872

关键词

energy efficiency; lighting measurement; road illuminance; street lighting; geographic information system GIS; global navigation; satellite systems GNSS

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The proposed method involves simultaneous measurement of illuminance from three lux meters placed on the roof of a vehicle to quickly assess the energy efficiency and illuminance of a street lighting installation. By localizing illumination values using GNSS and combining terrain maps and GIS data, detailed energy efficiency indicators for road sections or entire streets can be determined accurately.
The issue concerns the initial stage of work on a method for performing a rapid assessment of the energy efficiency and illuminance of a street lighting installation. The proposed method is based on simultaneous measurement of illuminance from three lux meters placed on the roof of the vehicle. The data are acquired in road traffic, while the vehicle is driving. The proposed solution will allow in the future to quickly and reproducibly obtain data about the lighting parameters of the studied road section. The illumination values are localised using Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS). Based on the collected measurement data, with the use of terrain maps, geographic information system (GIS) data and installation design documentation, it will be possible to determine in detail the parameters of energy efficiency indicators for a selected section of the street for the entire street according to the EN13201-5 standard. Preliminary tests were conducted on a section of about one kilometer of street illuminated in class C3. Detailed measurements reveal high variation of obtained energy indicators D-P and D-E for each road section. The reason for this condition is the variation of power, installation geometry and the presence of obstacles to light.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据