4.5 Article

A Novel Optimization Algorithm for Solar Panels Selection towards a Self-Powered EV Parking Lot and Its Impact on the Distribution System

期刊

ENERGIES
卷 14, 期 15, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/en14154515

关键词

electric vehicle; parking lot; photovoltaic; multi-criteria decision-making; self-sufficiency; optimal selection

资金

  1. Canada Excellence Research Chairs Program
  2. Tri-Agency Institutional Program Secretariat

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper proposes an original multi-criteria decision-making optimization algorithm RWR, compared to TOPSIS for validation. The results show RWR algorithm is faster and more accurate in finding the best solution. Additionally, the renewable energy-based EVPL designed in this study shows high self-sufficiency ratio and reduced energy losses on the network.
This paper proposes an original multi-criteria decision-making optimization algorithm to select the best solar panels in an existing market and optimally size the photovoltaic (PV) system for an electric vehicle parking lot (EVPL). Our proposed algorithm is called rank-weigh-rank (RWR), and it is compared to the well-known technique for order of preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) optimization algorithm under the same conditions for validation purposes. Results show that the speed of our proposed algorithm (RWR) in finding the best solution increases exponentially compared to TOPSIS when the numbers of alternatives and criteria increase. Moreover, 77% is the probability of obtaining results with more than 80% accuracy compared to TOPSIS, which validates the efficiency of our algorithm. In addition, we were able to design an EVPL with a power self-sufficiency ratio of 60.8%, the energy self-sufficiency ratio of 74.7%, and a payback period of 10.58 years. Moreover, the renewable energy-based EVPL was able to reduce the power losses on the network by 95.7% compared to an EVPL without a renewable energy system and improve the voltage deviation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据