4.5 Article

International Environmental Efficiency Trends and the Impact of the Paris Agreement

期刊

ENERGIES
卷 14, 期 15, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/en14154503

关键词

environmental efficiency; Paris Agreement; data envelopment analysis; meta-Malmquist; climate change; common but differentiated responsibilities

资金

  1. Taiwan's Ministry of Science and Technology [MOST 108-2410-H-004-005]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study evaluates the environmental efficiency of 150 economies from 2010 to 2017, finding that low-income groups suffered a decline in environmental efficiency while high-income groups made significant progress. The implementation of the Paris Agreement had a positive impact on the environmental efficiency of middle and lower-middle income groups, highlighting the importance of global cooperation in addressing environmental challenges and providing additional support to low-income groups.
This study estimates the environmental efficiency of 150 economies during the period of 2010-2017 to understand the environmental efficiency trend worldwide. This research adopts the meta-Malmquist approach to compare and capture the dynamic change in environmental efficiency among different income groups. The empirical results indicate that among the four income groups, only the low-income group suffers from regression in terms of environmental efficiency, while the high-income group achieves the greatest progress. For the high-income group, the source of improvement originates from the frontier shift rather than from efficiency change. By contrast, the improvement of the lower-income groups results from the catching-up effect. With regard to the effect of the Paris Agreement, only the lower middle-income group exhibits a statistical difference between the two periods, and environmental efficiency increases after the adoption of the Paris Agreement. The fight against global warming cannot succeed by relying only on specific countries. The whole world must cooperate and improve together, and thus, additional help must be devoted to the low-income group. The statistical results support that differences exist in terms of environmental efficiency among the four income groups. In particular, the low-income group is deteriorating.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据