4.5 Article

How Much Can Small-Scale Wind Energy Production Contribute to Energy Supply in Cities? A Case Study of Berlin

期刊

ENERGIES
卷 14, 期 17, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/en14175523

关键词

renewable energy; urban wind energy; energy transition; wind potential assessment

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper explores the potential of urban wind energy production with small wind turbines using Berlin as a case study, emphasizing the importance of decentralized energy production in climate-neutral cities. Findings suggest that while multiple turbines on suitable buildings can contribute significantly to households' energy consumption, they may not cover the full demand, highlighting the need for self-consumption of the produced electricity. The study recommends continued encouragement of small wind turbines use while also exploring other renewable resources or a combination of wind and photovoltaic energy in urban environments.
In light of the global effort to limit the temperature rise, many cities have undertaken initiatives to become climate-neutral, making decentralized urban energy production more relevant. This paper addresses the potential of urban wind energy production with small wind turbines, using Berlin as an example. A complete framework from data selection to economic feasibility is constructed to enable the empirical assessment of wind energy for individual buildings and Berlin as a whole. Based on a detailed dataset of all buildings and hourly wind speed on a 1 km(2) grid, the results show that multiple turbines on suitable buildings can significantly contribute to households' energy consumption but fall short of covering the full demand. For individual households, our economic evaluation strongly recommends the self-consumption of the produced electricity. The findings suggest that while the use of small wind turbines should be continuously encouraged, exploring other renewable resources or combination of wind and photovoltaic energy in the urban environment remains important.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据