4.5 Article

Stochastic Technical Stability Test of a Passenger Railroad Car Crossing a Turnout

期刊

ENERGIES
卷 14, 期 15, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/en14154569

关键词

stability; wheel-rail; vehicle-track; rail; vehicle dynamics

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article introduces a definition of stochastic technical stability and applies it to testing a mathematical model of passenger railroad cars. By conducting tests on the nonlinear mathematical model of passenger cars, the influence of various factors and technical conditions on stability assessment is determined. The research findings can be utilized for assessing the dynamics of electric vehicles.
This article presents a definition of stochastic technical stability that was applied to test a mathematical model of a passenger railroad car crossing a turnout with the speed exceeding 160 km/h. Stability defined in this way allows testing of Lyapunov's stability with disturbances from the track and for a nonlinear system. The STS test of a nonlinear mathematical model of a passenger car was carried out by perturbing the motion of the mathematical model with irregularities originating from the track gauge change and wheelset motion in the direction transverse to the track axis. The main aim of this paper was to determine the influence of various factors and technical conditions on the assessment of the stability of various means of transport. The analysis presented can be used to assess the dynamics of electric vehicles, whose mechanical parameters differ from those of combustion vehicles at present. The area of stable motion in the Lyapunov sense was defined using the STS method. Simulations were performed to determine the trajectory of the wheelset transverse motion. The probability of finding the wheelset in the stable motion area in relation to the rail for a single-point contact was determined. In practice, this is a one-point contact of the wheel with the rail. Conclusions from the conducted research are presented.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据