4.6 Article

Outcomes of endoscopic resection for superficial duodenal tumors: 10 years' experience in 18 Japanese high volume centers

期刊

ENDOSCOPY
卷 54, 期 7, 页码 663-670

出版社

GEORG THIEME VERLAG KG
DOI: 10.1055/a-1640-3236

关键词

-

资金

  1. Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background data on endoscopic resection for superficial duodenal epithelial tumors are limited due to their rarity. Different techniques such as EMR and ESD have varying success rates and complications. ESD may be a good option for large SDETs, especially when performed by experienced endoscopists.
Background Data on endoscopic resection (ER) for superficial duodenal epithelial tumors (SDETs) are insufficient owing to their rarity. There are two main ER techniques for SDETs: endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). In addition, modified EMR techniques, such as underwater EMR (UEMR) and cold polypectomy, are becoming popular. We conducted a large-scale retrospective multicenter study to clarify the detailed outcomes of duodenal ER. Methods Patients with SDETs who underwent ER at 18 institutions from January 2008 to December 2018 were included. The rates of en bloc resection and delayed adverse events (AEs; defined as delayed bleeding or perforation) were analyzed. Local recurrence was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results In total, 3107 patients (including 1017 undergoing ESD) were included. En bloc resection rates were 79.1%, 78.6%, 86.8%, and 94.8%, and delayed AE rates were 0.5%, 2.2%, 2.8%, and 6.8% for cold polypectomy, UEMR, EMR and ESD, respectively. The delayed AE rate was significantly higher in the ESD group than in non-ESD groups for lesions <19mm (7.4% vs. 1.9%; P <0.001), but not for lesions >20mm (6.1% vs. 7.1%; P =0.64). The local recurrence rate was significantly lower in the ESD group than in the non-ESD groups ( P <0.001). Furthermore, for lesions >30mm, the cumulative local recurrence rate at 2 years was 22.6% in the non-ESD groups compared with only 1.6% in the ESD group ( P <0.001). Conclusions ER outcomes for SDETs were generally acceptable. ESD by highly experienced endoscopists might be an option for very large SDETs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据