4.8 Article

CARS senses cysteine deprivation to activate AMPK for cell survival

期刊

EMBO JOURNAL
卷 40, 期 21, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.15252/embj.2021108028

关键词

AMPK; CARS; cell survival; cyst(e)ine

资金

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2018YFA0800300, 2018YFA0107103]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [91957203, 81930083, 82130087, 81874060]
  3. Chinese Academy of Sciences [XDB39020100]
  4. Program for Guangdong Introducing Innovative and Entrepreneurial Teams [2017ZT07S054]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study reveals that cysteine deficiency activates AMPK through CaMKK2, leading to cell death. Cysteine modulates AMPK activation by affecting the binding of CARS to AMPK.
Adenosine 5'-monophosphate (AMP)-activated protein kinase (AMPK) is an important cellular metabolite-sensing enzyme that can directly sense changes not only in ATP but also in metabolites associated with carbohydrates and fatty acids. However, less is known about whether and how AMPK senses variations in cellular amino acids. Here, we show that cysteine deficiency significantly triggers calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase kinase 2 (CaMKK2)-mediated activation of AMPK. In addition, we found that CaMKK2 directly associates with cysteinyl-tRNA synthetase (CARS), which then binds to AMPK gamma 2 under cysteine deficiency to activate AMPK. Interestingly, we discovered that cysteine inhibits the binding of CARS to AMPK gamma 2, and thus, under cysteine deficiency conditions wherein the inhibitory effect of cysteine is abrogated, CARS mediates the binding of AMPK to CaMKK2, resulting in the phosphorylation and activation of AMPK by CaMKK2. Importantly, we demonstrate that blocking AMPK activation leads to cell death under cysteine-deficient conditions. In summary, our study is the first to show that CARS senses the absence of cysteine and activates AMPK through the cysteine-CARS-CaMKK2-AMPK gamma 2 axis, a novel adaptation strategy for cell survival under nutrient deprivation conditions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据