4.8 Article

A small peptide inhibits siRNA amplification in plants by mediating autophagic degradation of SGS3/RDR6 bodies

期刊

EMBO JOURNAL
卷 40, 期 15, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.15252/embj.2021108050

关键词

autophagy; peptide; plant virus; RNA silencing; SGS3

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China [31872920, 31571978]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (CAU) [2020TC163]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Selective autophagy mediates the degradation of unwanted cytoplasmic components, maintaining cellular homeostasis. VISP1, a small peptide discovered in Arabidopsis during virus infection, interacts with SGS3 and plays a role in regulating the autophagic degradation of SGS3/RDR6 bodies, affecting viral siRNA amplification.
Selective autophagy mediates specific degradation of unwanted cytoplasmic components to maintain cellular homeostasis. The suppressor of gene silencing 3 (SGS3) and RNA-dependent RNA polymerase 6 (RDR6)-formed bodies (SGS3/RDR6 bodies) are essential for siRNA amplification in planta. However, whether autophagy receptors regulate selective turnover of SGS3/RDR6 bodies is unknown. By analyzing the transcriptomic response to virus infection in Arabidopsis, we identified a virus-induced small peptide 1 (VISP1) composed of 71 amino acids, which harbor a ubiquitin-interacting motif that mediates interaction with autophagy-related protein 8. Overexpression of VISP1 induced selective autophagy and compromised antiviral immunity by inhibiting SGS3/RDR6-dependent viral siRNA amplification, whereas visp1 mutants exhibited opposite effects. Biochemistry assays demonstrate that VISP1 interacted with SGS3 and mediated autophagic degradation of SGS3/RDR6 bodies. Further analyses revealed that overexpression of VISP1, mimicking the sgs3 mutant, impaired biogenesis of endogenous trans-acting siRNAs and up-regulated their targets. Collectively, we propose that VISP1 is a small peptide receptor functioning in the crosstalk between selective autophagy and RNA silencing.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据