4.6 Article

High-performance flexible and free-standing N-doped Ti3C2Tx/MoOx films as electrodes for supercapacitors

期刊

ELECTROCHIMICA ACTA
卷 389, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2021.138774

关键词

Nitrogen-doped delaminated-Ti3C2Tx; MoOx nanoparticles; Flexible and free-standing films; Ultrahigh capacity; Supercapacitors

资金

  1. Key Science and Technology Developing Project of Shaanxi Province [2020KWZ-004]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61774122]
  3. 111 Project of China [B14040]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

By preparing the N-d-Ti3C2Tx/MoOx film electrode, utilizing the high conductivity of N-d-Ti3C2Tx nanosheets and the high pseudocapacitance of MoOx nanoparticles, high capacity and excellent cycling stability are achieved through the synergistic effect of the two components.
In order to obtain high-performance flexible electrodes for supercapacitors, the nitrogen-doped delaminated-Ti3C2Tx (N-d-Ti3C2Tx) decorated with MoOx nanoparticles (N-d-Ti3C2Tx/MoOx) films are prepared by a one-step solvothermal method. The N-d-Ti3C2Tx nanosheets with high conductivity can facilitate electron transfer during the charge and discharge process, and the MoOx nanoparticles can contribute to high pseudocapacitance. Hence, their combination is expected to not only inhibit N-d-Ti3C2Tx nanosheets from re-stacking, but also enhance the specific capacity of the whole electrode. Here, benefiting from the synergistic effect of the two components, the obtained optimal flexible and free-standing N-d-Ti3C2Tx/MoOx film electrode delivers an ultrahigh capacity of 341.0 C g(-1) (920.6 C cm(-3), 487.1 F g(-1), 1315.2 F cm(-3)) at the scan rate of 2 mV s(-1), and shows superior capacity retention of 99.2% after 11000 cycles at the current density of 5 A g(-1). Moreover, the flexible and free-standing N-d-Ti3C2Tx/MoOx film electrode is also beneficial to promote the development of flexible supercapacitors. (C) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据