4.6 Article

Dual 2D CuSe/g-C3N4 heterostructure for boosting electrocatalytic reduction of CO2

期刊

ELECTROCHIMICA ACTA
卷 390, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2021.138766

关键词

CO2 reduction; Electrocatalysis; Dual 2D CuSe/g-C3N4; CO

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21776220, 21176192]
  2. Key Project of Tianjin Natural Science Foundation [19JCZDJC37600]
  3. Training Project of the Innovation Team of Colleges and Universities in Tianjin [TD13-5020]
  4. State Key Laboratory of Chemical Engineering [SKLChE20B05]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study focused on the synthesis of CuSe/g-C3N4 electrodes for electrochemical CO2RR, with the best performing electrode having a Faradaic efficiency of 85.28% at 50wt% CuSe on g-C3N4, 1.47 times higher than pure CuSe NPs. The introduction of g-C3N4 NSs provided a larger specific area and faster electron transfer speed, enhancing the CO selectivity of CO2RR.
CO2 Reduction Reaction (CO2RR) is an effective route to convert CO2 to value-added products in energy and environment. In this work, a series of CuSe/g-C3N4 electrodes were synthesized by anchoring hexagonal CuSe nanoplates on g-C3N4 nanosheets and used for electrochemical CO2 RR. Among the as-prepared electrodes, 50wt% CuSe on g-C3N4 performed the highest Faradaic efficiency of 85.28% to achieve 1.47 times higher than that of the pure CuSe NPs at -1.2 V vs. RHE due to the larger specific area provided by the introduction of planar-structure g-C3N4 NSs and faster electron transfer speed on the interface of CuSe NPs and g-C3N4 NSs. Meanwhile the calculations of density functional theory confirmed the electronic coupling on the electrodes to form an internal electric field between two materials and electron direction from g-C3N4 NSs to CuSe NPs. This work created a novel opportunity for optimizing design of electrode materials to enhance the CO selectivity of CO2RR. (C) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据