4.6 Article

Anodic polarization creates an electrocatalytically active Ni anode/electrolyte interface and mitigates the coarsening of Ni phase in SOFC

期刊

ELECTROCHIMICA ACTA
卷 391, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2021.138912

关键词

Solid oxide fuel cells; Nickel anode; Electrochemical polarization; Anode electrolyte interface; Mitigated microstructure coarsening

资金

  1. National Natural Science Founda-tion of China [21875038, 22005055]
  2. Tianjin University [TF2020-10]
  3. Fuzhou University [TF2020-10]
  4. Australian Research Council [DP180100731, DP180100568]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

For solid oxide fuel cells, an intimate anode/electrolyte interface can be created by applying anodic polarization current, leading to enhanced electrocatalytic activity and operating stability. The strong interfacial bonding induced by anodic polarization mitigates microstructure coarsening of Ni anodes, contributing to the enhanced stability.
An intimate Ni anode/electrolyte interface is vital for the performance and operating stability of solid oxide fuel cells, while the interface is greatly influenced under anodic polarization conditions. Here for the first time Ni anodes are directly assembled on 8 mol% Y2O3-stabilized ZrO2 (YSZ) electrolyte without high temperature sintering process, and the interface formation between Ni anode and YSZ electrolyte is studied at varied anodic polarization currents at 800 degrees C. The results show that an intimate anode/electrolyte interface can be created by applying anodic polarization current, leading to remarkably enhanced electrocatalytic activity and operating stability. The major reason of enhanced stability is ascribed to the mitigated microstructure coarsening of Ni anodes due to the strong interfacial bonding induced by the anodic polarization. The present findings shed lights on rational design of Ni based anode/electrolyte interface by tuning the anodic polarization. (C) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据