4.5 Article

Molecularly Imprinted Electrochemical Sensor for the Detection of Organophosphorus Pesticide Profenofos

期刊

ELECTROANALYSIS
卷 33, 期 8, 页码 1945-1951

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/elan.202100175

关键词

Polypyrrole; electrochemical impedance spectroscopy; organophosphate insecticide; voltammetric sensor; molecularly imprinted polymers; profenofos

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A reusable molecularly imprinted polypyrrole (MIP(O-PPy)) electrode was developed to detect profenofos in food, with optimized experimental parameters and excellent recognition performance.
The presence of profenofos (PFF) in food has been strictly limited by legislation due to its genotoxic and toxic effects on health. It is therefore very important to establish simple and rapid analytical methods to detect traces of this insecticide. A reusable molecularly imprinted polypyrrole MIP(O-PPy) on a glassy carbon electrode (GCE) has been developed to measure PFF. The PPy was polymerized by cyclic voltammetry (CV) in the presence of template molecules (PFF) in an acidic solution on a GCE. The various experimental parameters such as film thickness, analyte/monomer ratio, and removal/rebinding requirements were examined and optimized. The signal of the redox probe (ferrocyanide/ferrocyanide) was used for the electrochemical detections. All steps of the sensor manufacturing, removal/rebinding of template molecules, and response to different PFF concentrations were tested by cyclic voltammetry (CV), differential pulse voltammetry (DPV), and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS). The MIP sensor was able to detect PFF in the linear ranges of 1.0x10(-9) to 1.0x10(-6) M and 1.0x10(-9) to 5.0x10(-6) M, with detection limits, a signal-to-noise ratio (S/N) of three was used to estimate LOD, of about 1 nM using DPV and EIS, respectively. The MIP (PPy) GCE provided excellent PFF recognition performance and was successfully used to quantify PFF in sweet pepper samples, yielding recoveries not greater than 108 %.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据