4.6 Article

Cost-effectiveness analysis of pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) in patients with gastric cancer and peritoneal metastasis

期刊

EJSO
卷 48, 期 1, 页码 188-196

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2021.08.024

关键词

Cost-effectiveness; Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy; Gastric cancer

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study assessed the cost-effectiveness of pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy with low-dose cisplatin and doxorubicin (PIPAC C/D) for the treatment of advanced gastric cancer. The results showed that PIPAC C/D plus chemotherapy is a cost-effective strategy for upfront therapy, and PIPAC C/D as a second-line therapy has the potential to reduce costs and improve clinical outcomes for patients with advanced gastric cancer.
Objective: The aim of this study was to assess the cost-effectiveness of pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy with low-dose cisplatin and doxorubicin (PIPAC C/D) for the treatment of advanced gastric cancer. Methods: A Partitioned Survival Model followed by state transition Markov model was developed to estimate the costs and effectiveness of the use of PIPAC C/D versus palliative chemotherapy in the UK. The intervention was assessed at two different levels of care, including upfront therapy (PIPAC C/D plus Oxaliplatin in combination with Capecitabine (XELOX) chemotherapy versus first-line chemotherapy alone) and second-line therapy (PIPAC C/D alone versus second-line chemotherapy (ramucirumab monotherapy)). Data from multiple sources, including published literature and UK-based databases, were used to inform the economic model. Results: For the upfront therapy analysis, the estimated total costs in the intervention and comparator arms were 32,606 pound (SD: 3877) pound and 17,844 pound (SD: 920) pound, respectively. PIPAC C/D plus XELOX led to an increase of 0.46 in quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) gained. The incremental cost per QALY gained was 31,868 pound. For the second-line therapy analysis, the use of PIPAC C/D led to an increase of 0.19 in QALYs and a 21,474 pound reduction in costs, meaning the intervention was a dominant strategy. Conclusions: The cost-effectiveness results for the upfront therapy analysis indicate that PIPAC C/D plus chemotherapy is a cost-effective strategy. Additionally, PIPAC C/D alone as a second-line therapy has the potential to reduce costs and improve clinical outcomes for patients with advanced gastric cancer with peritoneal metastasis. (C) 2021 Elsevier Ltd, BASO similar to The Association for Cancer Surgery, and the European Society of Surgical Oncology. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据