4.7 Article

Potential health risks of metals in skin care products used by Chinese consumers aged 19?29 years

期刊

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2021.112184

关键词

Metal; Skin care product; Health risk; Hazard quotient

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41722110, 41571474]
  2. Leading Talents and Team Project of Scientific and Technological Innovation for Young and Middle-Aged Groups of Jilin Province [20200301015RQ]
  3. Major Special Program of Scientific and Technological of Jilin Province [20200503003SF]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study examined the usage patterns of skin care products and metal contamination risk among Chinese consumers, revealing that younger individuals face greater exposure risks due to higher frequency of product use; Al and Zn were found to pose higher risks to consumers due to their high dermal absorption dose.
Metal contamination of skin care products that occurs during their production poses potential health risks, which are of increasing concern, to consumers. Here, we collected 570 responses to an online survey to analyze the usage pattern of skin care products across China. Then a total of 30 commonly used skin care products with various prices and applications were purchased. The concentrations of metals (Al, Zn, Cu, Ni, Cr, Pb, Hg, and Cd) and metalloid As, were determined. Next, we improved the frequency calculation method and used the weighted exposure frequency to calculate the dermal absorption dose (DAD). The amounts of Zn, Cr, and Al that were assimilated by the human body via uptake were approximately 2 orders of magnitude greater than those of Pb, Hg, Cd, Ni and metalloid As. In addition, younger consumers were at higher risk of metals exposure than older consumers because of their higher frequency of use of skin care products. Al and Zn posed higher risk to consumers because of its high DAD. There was no significant chronic non-carcinogenic health risk (hazard index < 1) posed by skincare product use.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据