4.0 Article

Diatom sedimentary assemblages and Holocene pH reconstruction from the Canadian Arctic Archipelago's largest lake

期刊

ECOSCIENCE
卷 28, 期 3-4, 页码 347-360

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/11956860.2021.1926642

关键词

Nettilling Lake; paleolimnology; sediments; diatoms; lake acidity; paleoclimate

类别

资金

  1. Fonds de recherche du Quebec -Nature et technologies (FRQNT)
  2. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) of Canada

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The Arctic has experienced significant warming in recent decades. The evolution of Arctic climate during the Holocene needs further clarification. Lake water pH is influenced by hydrological processes dependent on climate variations.
The Arctic has warmed significantly over the past decades. However, the evolution of Arctic climate during the Holocene remains to be clarified in more detail, and regional factors controlling aquatic ecosystem evolution need to be better defined to grasp the sensitivity of lakes to rapid environmental change. Nettilling Lake was studied for changes in sedimentary diatom assemblages over the last 5 000 years. Lake water pH was reconstructed by applying a diatom-based lake water pH inference model. We hypothesized that the changes in diatom assemblages were driven by variations in lake water transparency and attendant water turbidity associated with the input of fine suspended solids from glacial meltwaters. Reduced underwater light resulted in greater abundance of planktonic over benthic taxa from ca. 5 000 to 3 000 yrs. cal. BP, followed by less turbid conditions and proliferation of benthic taxa during regional cooling. The lake water was slightly alkaline throughout the Holocene, ranging between pH 7.1 and 7.7. Our results support the notion that hydrological processes, dependent on climate variations, have a first-order influence on the regulation of the lake water pH through glacial meltwater inputs, which will likely continue to control the lake's long-term chemical and biological evolution.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据