4.8 Article

Grazing-induced biodiversity loss impairs grassland ecosystem stability at multiple scales

期刊

ECOLOGY LETTERS
卷 24, 期 10, 页码 2054-2064

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/ele.13826

关键词

asynchrony; grazing intensity; herbivory; metacommunity; scale dependence; sheep

类别

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2016YFC0500503]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of China [31988102, 31870505]
  3. Open Project Program of 'Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Ecology and Resources Use of the Mongolian Plateau' [KF2020003]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Livestock grazing affects grassland stability differently at different scales, increasing species stability but decreasing local community stability, ultimately reducing stability at larger spatial scales. Maintaining biodiversity across scales is crucial for the sustainability of grassland ecosystem functions and services.
Livestock grazing is a major driver shaping grassland biodiversity, functioning and stability. Whether grazing impacts on grassland ecosystems are scale-dependent remains unclear. Here, we conducted a sheep-grazing experiment in a temperate grassland to test grazing effects on the temporal stability of productivity across scales. We found that grazing increased species stability but substantially decreased local community stability due to reduced asynchronous dynamics among species within communities. The negative effect of grazing on local community stability propagated to reduce stability at larger spatial scales. By decreasing biodiversity both within and across communities, grazing reduced biological insurance effects and hence the upscaling of stability from species to communities and further to larger spatial scales. Our study provides the first evidence for the scale dependence of grazing effects on grassland stability through biodiversity. We suggest that ecosystem management should strive to maintain biodiversity across scales to achieve sustainability of grassland ecosystem functions and services.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据