4.8 Article

Historical decrease in agricultural landscape diversity is associated with shifts in bumble bee species occurrence

期刊

ECOLOGY LETTERS
卷 24, 期 9, 页码 1800-1813

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/ele.13786

关键词

Agricultural intensification; Bombus; crop diversity; ecoinformatics

类别

资金

  1. USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture Sustainable Agriculture Systems Coordinated Agricultural Program [2019-68012-29852]
  2. National Institute of Food and Agriculture [2019-67013-29298]
  3. University of Wisconsin Hatch [WIS01988]
  4. National Institute of Food and Agriculture Sustainable Agriculture Systems Coordinated Agricultural Program [2019-68012-29852, 2019-67013-29298]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Agricultural intensification may lead to declines in bumble bee species, while high crop diversity is beneficial for insect conservation. Increasing on-farm and landscape-level crop diversity is predicted to have positive effects on bumble bees, even in agriculturally dominated areas.
Agricultural intensification is a key suspect among putative drivers of recent insect declines, but an explicit link between historical change in agricultural land cover and insect occurrence is lacking. Determining whether agriculture impacts beneficial insects (e.g. pollinators), is crucial to enhancing agricultural sustainability. Here, we combine large spatiotemporal sets of historical bumble bee and agricultural records to show that increasing cropland extent and decreasing crop richness were associated with declines in over 50% of bumble bee species in the agriculturally intensive Midwest, USA. Critically, we found that high crop diversity was associated with a higher occurrence of many species pre-1950 even in agriculturally dominated areas, but that current agricultural landscapes are devoid of high crop diversity. Our findings suggest that insect conservation and agricultural production may be compatible, with increasing on-farm and landscape-level crop diversity predicted to have positive effects on bumble bees.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据