4.1 Article

Pharmacokinetics of genistein distribution in blood and retinas of diabetic and non-diabetic rats

期刊

出版社

JAPANESE SOC STUDY XENOBIOTICS
DOI: 10.1016/j.dmpk.2021.100404

关键词

Diabetes; Genistein; Permeability; Pharmacokinetics; Retina

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study showed that increasing genistein dose did not change its bioavailability in diabetic and non-diabetic rats. However, genistein concentration in the retina was significantly higher in diabetic rats, possibly due to increased permeability of the blood-retinal barrier in early diabetes.
Genistein, a natural tyrosine kinase inhibitor, may act as an intraocular antiangiogenic agent. Its therapeutical use, however, is limited by its nonlinear pharmacokinetics. We aimed to determine genistein's kinetics and retinal tissue distributions in normal and diabetic rats. We developed an isocratic, reverse-phase C18 HPLC system to measure genistein concentration in blood and retinas of streptozotocin (65 mg/kg IV)-diabetic and non-diabetic rats receiving two types of genistein-rich diet (150 and 300 mg/kg) for ten days. Genistein's decay exhibited a two-compartmental open model. Half-lives of distribution and elimination were 2.09 and 71.79 min, with no difference between groups. Genistein steady-state concentration in blood for 150 and 300 mg/kg diet did not differ between diabetic (0.259 +/- 0.07 and 0.26 +/- 0.06 mg/ml) and non-diabetic rats (0.192 +/- 0.05 and 0.183 +/- 0.09 mg/ml). In retina, genistein concentration was significantly higher in diabetic rats (1.05 +/- 0.47 and 0.997 +/- 0.47 mu g/gm wt. vs. 0.087 +/- 0.11 and 0.314 +/- 0.18 mu g/gm wt., p < 0.05). The study determined that increasing genistein dose did not change its bioavailability, perhaps due to the poor aqueous solubility. The retina's increased genistein could be due to increased permeability of blood-retinal barrier that occurs early in diabetes. (C) 2021 The Japanese Society for the Study of Xenobiotics. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据